Exopolitical Comment # 20
The Neo-Conservative Shake Up of the CIA and Implications for Extraterrestrial Disclosure
I would like to comment on the recent events in the CIA and the top level resignations that have occurred that with the new Director, Porter Goss. It's clear that there is some payback happening here for what occurred during the recent election when the CIA played a role in leaking information about the Bush administration. Some Senators such as John McCain describe the CIA as a rogue institution and that it needed to be reigned in. See the following story on this: http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/editorial/outlook/2906907
Well the question that can be raised is how do all these events relate to exopolitics? On a conventional political level, we can see this 'housecleaning' at the CIA as the triumph of a hard-line neo-conservative approach to foreign policy over a more moderate and cooperative approach to major foreign policy issues. The CIA under Tenet did have a more cautious approach to Iraq and this was consistently ignored by the Bush administration, and Tenet and the CIA were made the scapegoat for the manipulation of intelligence material that supported the preemptive war.
The departure of Colin Powell from the Department of State signifies that the Bush administration will not tolerate dissent at the Cabinet level from the main foreign policy principles that Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Cheney are advocating. So we have all the signs of a recent power struggle and that neo-conservatives have triumphed, and will set the agenda for the next four years. This is where it becomes interesting in terms of the shadow government and exopolitics.
It is fairly well known that the shadow government has been divided by factional struggles over how to approach the ET issue. One faction advocates a hard-line approach, while the other is more tolerant and supportive of the ET presence. Whistleblowers such as Daniel Burisch have commented extensively on these different approaches, and the factional infighting that has occurred: http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-12.htm.
Now as I've argued in a number of papers, the US has a number of agreements with ETs that started under the Eisenhower administration: http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/editorial/outlook/2906907
In my view, the secret agreements with the ETs has predictably led to diverging opinions within the shadow government on how to respond to the ETs. One position is that they can be trusted and can greatly assist humanity through technology exchanges, assistance, etc. This is especially championed by whistleblowers such as Dan Burisch or Michael Wolf who interacted with the Gray ETs that participated in these agreements. Individuals promoting this view basically have much trust in the Grays from Zeta Reticulum, and the Tall Grays from Orion, as dependable allies in helping humanity emerge into an interplanetary society.
The other position is that the ETs with whom the agreements have been made can't really be trusted and this is where one reads reports of a hard line approach to ETs advocated by people such as Col Philip Corso in his Day After Roswell. Individuals promoting this hard-line approach are very nationalistic and prepared to fight to maintain US independence from manipulation by the Grays while simultaneously seeking technology and assistance from the Grays in a variety of joint projects such as at Dulce, New Mexico: http://www.exopolitics.org/Dulce-Report.htm .
I think that the struggle we've seen in the conventional political system between a hard-line neo-conservative and more moderate cooperative approach to foreign policy mirrors what has been happening in the shadow government. So what we have now is evidence of the emergence of a hard-line approach to the ET presence. This takes me to the topic of extraterrestrial disclosure since I believe that we are quickly reaching that time when some announcement will be made. I think this is inevitable since frankly as you have guessed by now, terrorism is a pretty feeble enemy against the U.S., and there needs to be a new enemy to justify the enormous military expenditure that is occurring and the black budget that is covertly collected by the CIA:
This is an idea that Carol Rosin has been saying for years based on her experiences with the corporate military world, and what Werner Von Braun told her would eventually happen as different threats would lose appeal: http://www.davidicke.net/mysteries/reports/rosinreport.html
It seems that once terrorism becomes a toothless tiger, the shadow government will draw out the ET bogey after having exhausted everything else. We know that in 2005, there will be a remake of War of the Worlds by Steven Spielberg so there's a hint that some kind of hard-line approach is very likely when it comes to ETs.
To sum up so far, the cleaning out of the CIA is evidence of a power play by the neo-conservatives to edge out of key positions more moderate and cooperative approaches to foreign policy, and more covertly to the ET presence. This is done in preparation for a disclosure announcement once it has been concluded that the terrorist bogey has no psychological impact on the American population. The likely spin to be placed on the ETs is that while there have been a number of agreements reached with them, they can't be trusted and so a rigorous national security system has to be set up to monitor them and the humans they interact with. All this will serve to justify the vast national security system set in place to monitor extraterresrials, and the vast black budget created to fund this system.
Well the key question that can be asked is whether the triumph of the neo-conservatives is a bad policy development or not when it comes to ET affairs? Frankly, I'm divided on this. On the one hand, I see a great threat posed by the agreements set up with ETs from Zeta Reticulum and from Orion. The research I've done on different ET races shows that these ETs have a track record in subverting worlds and using the captive population as a gene pool. A number of contactees with alleged Nordices from a number of worlds mention this kind of scenario, e.g., Billy Meier, Alex Collier, Enrique Castillo. For example, the following statement from an alleged Nordic ET from Procyon exemplifies this alarming scenario:
"The Grays began to visit us, first a few as ambassadors, then as specialists in various domains where their expertise could be useful to us, as participants in different programs that involved mutual collaboration, and finally as tourists. What had begun as a trickle became a flood, as they came in ever-increasing numbers, slowly but surely infiltrating our society at all levels, penetrating even the most secret of our elite power groups . Just as on your planet they began by unobtrusively gaining control over key members of the CIA and KGB through techniques unknown to them, such as telepathic hypnosis that manipulates the reptilian levels of the brain, so on Procyon through the same techniques they established a kind of telepathic hypnotic control over our leaders. Over our leaders and over almost all of us, because it was as if we were under a spell that was leading us to our doom, as if we were being programmed by a type of ritual black magic that we did not realize existed."
On the other hand, a national security crack down by neo-conservatives who play the ET bogey also carries dangers in terms of how all ET affairs would presumably be closely monitored and subject to approval. Centralizing national security institutions and limiting human extraterrestrial contacts to only those approved by key government agencies carries risks as well. We could well imagine the creation of a Fortress Terra where only those ETs who trade technology with the government will be officially approved. Such ETs will be closely monitored as well as those citizens who have contact with these. This could well mean the exclusion of the many positive ET races that have assisted in the moral and spiritual development of humanity, and who have declined to participate in technology exchanges which they rightly perceived would be exploited for weapons purposes. Exclusing such positive extraterrestrial races from interacting with humanity would make it possible for extraterrestrial subversion to occur by those ETs with whom agreements have been made: http://www.exopolitics.org/Study-Paper-4.htm.
I believe humanity is entering treacherous territory where we will have to skillfully navigate between the dangers of ET subversion by cooperating too closely with the Grays from Zeta Reticulum/Orion or cracking down too hard on all forms of ET contact. I still believe that the best solution we have to dealing with the ET presence is to have an open transparent system where private citizens are given a more prominent role in the decision making about which ETs to work with, and how to deal with problems of subversion, manipulation etc., by some ETs (see: http://www.exopolitics.org/Study-Paper-7.htm ). Exopolitics will soon burst into the public arena as an urgent set of policy issues, we will do well to be prepared for the exopolitics issues about to be thrust upon us.
© Michael E. Salla, PhD
November 18, 2004
Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.